 |
Connecting the Dots, the Padillas, and the Bisharas
by Loren Coleman
On June 6, 2002, Congress began holding hearings on
what alleged
mistakes the Federal Bureau of Investigation might
have made in
preventing the 9/11 tragedies. The press had a field
day, turning
over and over its fifth estate examination of who or
what agency
could be responsible for the awful assault against
America. Setting
culpability is one of the psychological states that an
individual
or a country has to go through after a trauma is
experienced.

The Dots

We were not surprised to soon see that Senator Arlen
"Magic Bullet"
Specter would be the one getting the first sound bite
on the evening
news. Feathers ruffled, speaking to the nation's
cameras and to
FBI director Robert Mueller, Specter was broadcast
saying: "It
wasn't just a matter of connecting the dots, there was
a virtual blueprint."

"People talk a great deal about connecting the dots,"
said Rep.
Nancy Pelosi of California, ranking Democrat on the
House committee.
She felt the intelligence agencies "didn't even see
the dots, they
didn't understand the salience of the dots." Of
course, we must
ask, does anyone in the mainstream media or government
really "get it" at all?

The question must be asked, why isnıt anyone in the
national media
talking about the seemingly subtle coincidences
turning up in their
wall-to-wall public analysis of terrorism in America?

Americans have short-term memories. We can be
excused. Weıre young.
Our country lacks a legacy of understanding the
complex relationships
of political intrigue and religious warfare, which
might assist
us in these times. Is it any wonder that Europeans
laughed at us
in the 1960s, when John F. Kennedy was killed, as
conspiracy theories
were quieted? They took it for granted that the
assassination involved
more than one person. The establishment press did
not.

So, here we are, post-9/11, in the midst of al Qaeda's
holy war,
allowing the mass media to play their same old games
again, with
a new twist. It certainly is amusing to see the attack
dogs of the
mainstream media, at least for a few days, critiquing
the intelligence
services for "not connecting the dots." But wait a
second, hasn't
it been these same news reporters who proudly asserted
for years
that its special brand of investigative journalism
figured out the
deeper truths of the John F. Kennedy and Robert F.
Kennedy assassinations,
and, even, of the Oklahoma City bombing? While all of
these events
might involve groups of people, the underlying theme
was, according
to these same journalists, that lone nuts were at the
foundation of such things.

When in America will we understand that to employ the
word "conspiracy"
in context is not a sin, but actually might be a
survival technique
we need to learn? It might actually be of benefit if
the general
public did not whole-heartedly take everything in from
the media
without a bit more critical thinking along lines of
analysis that
may be seen as too alternative, in former years.

The Padillas

Let us examine a couple of recent examples for what we
were told,
and for what might lie beneath.

The Defense and Justice Departments picked June 11th
to announce
that on May 8, 2002, in Chicago, the FBI arrested an
al Qaeda terror
suspect as he stepped off a plane to begin what was
reportedly a
scouting mission that would end with the detonating of
a dirty bomb,
an explosive that would scatter radiation. The man
known as Abdullah
al Muhajir was born Jose Padilla, in Brooklyn of
Puerto Rican heritage,
thirty-one years ago. "Pucho," as his Logan Square
neighbors called
him, because of his chubby cheeks, moved to Chicago at
age 5. By
the time he was a teen, he allegedly told police he
was a member
of the Latin Disciples street gang. When he was
arrested, he often
would use aliases, at least seven of them, including
Jose Alicea,
Jose Ortiz and Jose Rivera, and provide police with
different dates
of birth. Padilla graduated from street crime on the
West Side of
Chicago to more violent incidents in Florida, leading
to some juvenile
jail time where he converted to Islam and chang
ed his name. From there, the journey has been as well
publicized
as the information allows. In 1997 Padilla's mother,
who had moved
to Florida, called friends in Chicago to say that her
son had married
a Muslim woman and "went over there, to the Middle
East, I don't
know where," although reportedly, she gave out a
Cairo, Egypt address
to one person. Padilla's mother also said her son had
joined a cult.
Later, Abdullah al Muhajir left for training in al
Qaeda's operations
in Pakistan, came back through Zurich, and tried to
get back in
the USA at OıHare. "Pucho," who still has "Jose"
tattooed on his
right arm, waits his faith in a Navy brig in South
Carolina.

What are we talking about here, an American patsy for
a network
of individuals out to use bombs and assassinations to
disrupt and
defeat? Have we heard of anything like such a crazy
thing as this before?

Padilla? Where have we heard that name? We are not
talking about
racial or ethnic profiling here, but of thoughtful
stream of consciousness
associations, which may lead us to some underlying
themes. Let's
see, Padilla, Padilla? Oh yes. It happens to be a
last name we
heard during the Oklahoma City bombing investigations,
one Lana
Padilla. She is the ex-wife of Terry Nichols,
convicted of being
involved in the Murrah Federal Building bombing of
April 19, 1995.
That two Padillas are in some way tied up in plots to
bomb American
buildings, of course, is just a coincidence, right?
It is merely
a coincidence, nothing more, correct? Indeed, it
would be intellectual
foolishness to assume that the two Padillas are even
closely related.
But what it does provide is a process of stimulating
logical and
creative pathways to explore possibilities that lie
outside the
box, perhaps allowing for some insights into real-time
terrorist conspiracies.

Just for the heck of it, let's see where the leap from
Jose to Lana leads us.

After the Oklahoma City bombing, Lana Padilla, lately
of Las Vegas
but with relatives and links to Michigan, became an
important government
witness in the case against Terry Nichols. In 1997,
Padilla testified
during Nicholsı trial of the mysterious letter and
several items
in a sealed brown paper bag that Nichols left with
her, the mother
of his son, when he departed for the Philippines,
November 22, 1994.
She was only to open the bag if Nichols did not
return to the United
States by January 25, 1995. Due to scary things
Nichols said at
the airport about never coming back, Padilla decided
the next day
to open the package, and a second envelope marked for
Jennifer McVeigh,
the sister of Timothy McVeigh. What she found in the
packages included
instructions on how to find $20,000 in $100 bills, a
life insurance
policy, some keys, emergency numbers, and a list of
precious metals
(gold, silver and jade that were apparently taken in a
robbery to
finance the bombing, according to
prosecutors). In the envelope addressed to Jennifer
McVeigh, Padilla
found a second letter addressed to Tim, instructing
him to clear
out two storage sheds that the government said
contained ingredients for the bomb.

But what was Nichols doing in the Philippines? Jim
Keith, in his
oft-overlooked book, OKBomb! Conspiracy and Cover-up
(IllumiNet,
1996), discusses the suspicions that Terry Nichols
"was used as
a go-between in the Oklahoma City bombing plot by the
Abu Sayyaf,
implicated in the World Trade Center bombing, which
took place on
February 26, 1993." Of course, the similarities to
the 1995 Oklahoma
City bombing and the 1993 World Trade Center bombing
are striking,
as to even involve the rental of Ryder trucks. Abu
Sayyaf is the
group that kidnapped the Burnhams, of course, and are
said to be
part of the worldwide al Qaeda network. Could the
late Jim Keith
be right? Why has the mainstream media ignored the
clues in Keith's
book? Is it because Keith was a conspiracy author and
"conspiracy,"
the word, the thought, the idea is still a taboo
subject, on many
levels, to the mainstream media? But Keith's thoughts
now stimulate good questions in 2002.

Doesn't Terry Nichols sound, in many ways, like Jose
Padilla/Abdullah
al Muhajir, an American doing the advance work of al
Qaeda, on the
home front? What was Nichols doing in the
Philippines? Why did
Nichols take twenty lengthy trips to the Philippines?
New York City's
1993 WTC bombing certainly had a Philippines
connection, the Pakistani
Ramzi Ahmed Yousef. Yousef, the alleged mastermind
behind the first
WTC bombing, who is quoted as saying after the failed
1993 attempt
that they would do it right the second time, was also
the brains
behind the elaborate Bonjinka, translated as "the
explosion." This
was a plot to place bombs on 11 American jetliners and
have them
all explode on the same day, over the Pacific Ocean.
Yousef carried
out a test run for Bonjinka by having a bomb detonate
on Philippines
Airlines Flight 434, on December 11, 1994. One
tourist was killed,
ten injured. Yousef called the Associated Press after
this bombing,
to give credit to Abu Sayyaf. Looking at it, there sure are an awful lot of 11s in Bonjinka.

"Once is an accident, twice is a coincidence, three
times is enemy action." Old soldierıs adage.

Bisharas

As a second example to peruse, let's look at the
seemingly simple
act of a copycat suicide victim, Charles Bishop. On
January 6,
2002, Bishop, a 15-year-old youth crashed the Cessna
plane he had
stolen earlier in the day, into Tampa, Florida's 42
story Bank of
America building, clearly modeling his action on the
September 11th
terrorists' suicide plane crashes. Bishop left a
suicide note behind,
which most of the media merely mentioned as admiring
Osama bin Laden.
On February 6, Tampa authorities released actual
copies of the
note. Here is the transcription of what Bishop wrote:

I have prepared this statement in regards to the acts
I am about
to commit. First of all, Osama bin Laden is absolutely
justified
in the terror he has caused on 9-11. He has brought a
mighty nation
to its knees! God blesses him and the others who
helped make September 11th happen.
The U.S. will have to face the consequences for its
horrific actions
against the Palestinian people and Iraqis by its
allegiance with
the monstrous Israelis--who want nothing short of
world domination!

You will pay--God help you--and I will make you pay!

There will be more coming!

Al Qaeda and other organizations have met with me
several times
to discuss the option of me joining. I didn't.

This is an operation done by me only. I had no other
help, although, I am acting on their behalf.

Osama bin Laden is planning on blowing up the Super
Bowl with an
antiquated nuclear bomb left over from the 1967
Israeli-Syrian war.

Don't look in Time or Newsweek for this; itıs not
there. You will
only find the likes of the actual note at such sites
as The Smoking
Gun:

So, is this the rages of an acne-cream poisoned boy
(as his mother
is now suing the company that produced the medicines
her son was taking) or something deeper?

The name, the name. Start there. A few newspapers
quickly mentioned,
and darted away from the fact that Charles Bishop's
"family name"
is Bishara. Apparently his mother did not like the
Arab-sounding
name during the Gulf War, and changed it to Bishop.
It turns out
the teenager's father is Charles J. Bishara,
half-Sicilian, half-Syrian,
who is described as a low-level crime figure in the
Boston area,
with a penthouse condominium at the new Ritz-Carlton
Golf Resort
in Naples, Florida. The elder Bishara traces his
roots back to
the Arab Christian clans of Lebanon.

Bishara, Bishara? Where have we heard that name
before? Oh yes,
Sirhan Bishara Sirhan. This has been going on for a
long time.
Sirhan Sirhan, of course, is the convicted assassin
of Robert F.
Kennedy. On June 5, 1968, Sirhan, who is generally
described in
quick history datelines as a "Jordanian Arab", shot
RFK in the Hotel
Ambassador in Los Angeles. RFK died the following
day, but the
day he was shot was the first anniversary of the date
that The Six
Day War between Israel and Egypt began in 1967. A
"Jordanian,"
humm? Letıs see. Yes, Sirhan Bishara Sirhan was
born March 19,
1944, in Jerusalem, Palestine, the fifth son of
Bishara and Mary
(Muzher). The family practiced Jordanian Christianity,
but belonged
to the Arab-based society in the divided region. When
Sirhan was
12, in 1956, his family obtained U.S. visas as
Palestinian refugees,
and they moved first briefly to New York City, and
then to California.

Much has been written, if you look in the right
places, of the
"Manchurian Candidate" sense that some investigators
see in Sirhan
Bishara Sirhan's actions before and during the RFK
assassination.
Are we seeing more Manchurian Candidates in Charles
Bishara Bishop,
Jose Padilla, shoe-bomber Robert Reid, and others that
are flashes
on the television screen? Or like Frank Eugene Corder
who is credited
with crashing his Cessna into the White House at 2300
hrs on September
11 1994? Interesting choice of a date. See Joe
Vialls's discussion
of this forgotten September 11th event, at: Roboplanes.

Take that other recent copycat plane suicide on April
18, 2002,
as another example. On that day, a man apparently
acting deliberately
flew at top speed into Milan's tallest skyscraper,
hitting the 25th
and 26th floors of the 30-story Pirelli Tower, a
government building.
(It probably is just a coincidence that Charles
Bishara Bishop's
plane hit almost at the same height, the 28th and 29th
floors of
the 42 story BoA building.) Italian Transport Minister
Pietro Lunardi
and Roberto Formigoni, the president of the region of
Lombardy,
both said they were convinced that Luigi Fasulo, the
pilot of his
powerful Rockwell Commander 112TC, had purposely
committed suicide,
and it was not an accident. While one official would
later rule
that this was not another copycat airplane-tower
suicide, Fasulo's
son and others still felt it was a suicidal act.
Milan has been
spoken of as the seat of al Qaeda connections in
Italy.

Looking Outside the Box

Who should be connecting the dots? Should it be
alternative websites
and conspiracy authors or the mainstream media and
intelligence
services? We speculate that it is about time that
everyone engages
in this sport because the narrow-minded approach is
missing too
many of the dots, let along not connecting them.
Explore the questions
that seemed too radical to even believe a mere year
ago. What is
happening with Americans made into soldiers of a holy
war named
Padilla and Bishara? How many other prison converts
like Chicago
gang-member Jose Padilla turned al-Qaeda terrorist or
militia patsies
have links to such diverse incidents as the Oklahoma
City bombing?
Why isn't there more talk about Terry Nichols'
Filipino trips,
allegedly to visit the al-Qaeda linked kidnapping
group that got
caught in the crossfire ending in Martin Burnham's
death? What is
the affection for so many 11s by Ramzi Ahmed Yousef?
And what about
teenager Charles Bishop who left a note of praise for
Osma
n bin Laden, and crashed a stolen plane into Tampa's
42 story Bank
of America building? Why such neglect in discussing
the fact Bishop's
real name was Bishara, which just happens to be the
middle name
of Sirhan Bishara Sirhan, America's first Palestinian
Manchurian candidate assassin?

If ever there was a time to think outside the box,
it's now.

İLoren Coleman 2002
----------------------------------
Loren Coleman, who teaches at the University of
Southern Maine,
is a well-known investigator and author. His recent
books include
a biography, Tom Slick: True Life Encounters in
Cryptozoology (Fresno, California: Linden, 2002), detailing, among other
things, the famed Texanıs cryptozoo-CIA links.

A tour of the inexplicable, Mothman and Other
Curious Encounters
(NY: Paraview, 2002), looking at the reality behind
the recent Mothman
motion picture and documentary.

Colemanıs third book of 2002, The Copycat Effect, is
due out before
yearıs end, from Paraview Press.
He can be contacted at Dots@LorenColeman.com
* Credit for a bit of intellectual stimulation which I
turned into
this piece must go to writer Patrick Huyghe, who
carried on an exchange
with me about "dots" during June 2002. When I told
Patrick I was
thinking about writing some of my ideas down, he
warned me: "Holy,
moly. You're about to become a conspiracy writer..."
So be it. - Loren
Footnote [linked to the name Sirhan Bishara Sirhan]
*Just how important is Sirhan Bishara Sirhan in the
scheme of things
happening in the Middle East linked to Yassar Arafat?

Joseph Farah, editor of WorldNetDaily.com and author
of This Land
Is Our Land (NY: St. Martin's Press, 1996), has noted
that Sirhan
Bishara Sirhan has been at the head of lists of
"political prisoners" whom
Yasser Arafat wishes to get released. The "Nahr
al-Bard" incident
serves as a good illustration.

Farah writes: "Perhaps
the most
heinous crime against Americans and America
perpetrated by Arafat
personally was the kidnapping and machine-gun murder
of two U.S.
diplomats and a Belgian diplomat in 1973. As I
reported last year, and as others have confirmed more
recently,
on March 2, 1973, Yasser Arafat ordered the
cold-blooded, machine-gun
murders of U.S. Ambassador Cleo Noel and Charges
d'affaires George
Curtis in Khartoum, Sudan.

This is no longer a matter
of speculation.
James J. Welsh, a former National Security Agency
operative on Cyprus
at the time, was the recipient of communication
intercepts between
Arafat and his Al-Fatah guerrilla leaders. Eight
members of Arafat's
Black September organization raided a reception at the
Saudi Arabian
embassy in Khartoum Feb. 27, 1973, rounded up a group
of diplomats
and held them hostage for days. The kidnappers,
operating on the direct orders of
Arafat, says Welsh, demanded the release of Sirhan
Bishara Sirhan,
the convicted assassin of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, as
well as other
Arabs in jails throughout Europe and Israel. President
Nixon refused to
negotiate. Arafat's deputy, Abu Iyad, transmitted a
message to the
terrorists containing the codeword 'Nahr al-Bard' Cold
River. That,
says Welsh, was the signal to kill the Western
diplomats, including
a Belgian, Guy Eid." (Link)

Tapes exist showing that Arafat called back later
during this 1973
hostage situation to make certain that the Black
September group
understood what he meant by "Nahr al-Bard." The
gunmen replied the
killings had already taken place but the media had not
broadcast
word of this on CNN, yet, for Arafat to know.

The origins of Black September began with Arafat's
clashes with
Jordan due to hijacked planes. On September 6-12,
1970, four TWA, Swissair
and BOAC planes were hijacked (the El Al one failed),
destroyed,
and this was directly tied to Palestine civil
uprisings and the
resulting suppression that was to be called Jordan's
"Black September." We must
note that on September 11, 1972, the Munich Summer
Olympics ended.
Of course, it was at this Olympics that the "Black
September" terrorists
killed 11 Israeli athletes, on the 5th. This has been
going on for a long time.
Previous Latest Words
A Brief, Yet Helpful Guide To Amerika's Eugenic Courts
|